Many movies have tried to offer commentary on the Iraq war and have failed tremendously at the box office. From Paul Haggis’ In the Valley of Elah and the Reese Witherspoon vehicle Rendition, these movies have struggled to find an audience. It may be fatigue, not wanting to “escape” by watching such movies, or it may be simply a matter of not wanting to be lectured to. So hopes were not high for American Son.
Coming home to life in Bakersfield after coming back from Camp Pendleton and Marine boot camp, 19 year old Mike Holland (Nick Cannon) re-examines his life and relationships. To be honest, the idea of Nick Cannon in a serious role might be cause for skepticism (although he has really grown on me since becoming the host of America’s Got Talent. Yeah, I said it.). Armed with a powerful, honest screenplay by first-timer Eric Schmid, he exudes a confident charm and a sly humor.
“Live it up, my man. It’s all gone so fast.” –Dad (Chi McBride)
American Son explores the familiar territory of how we can’t go home again (even apparently after a few months … if nothing has changed but you have), dealing with family and the possibility of a new relationship, on the eve of being shipped off to war. The reality of his mortality driven home by this fact, Mike looks at his life in a new way. Grasping on to what is important while clinging to his responsibilities and duties.
“Tell you the truth, I’d much rather be over there facing that shit than wasting away life everybody else.” –Mike
With 96 hours until he ships out, regular inter-titles count down the hours until his departure, he has to come to terms with his life. He wanted to test himself and seek out new opportunities, but he still has to deal with the realities of his life: his younger sister (Erica Gluck) who idolizes him, his religious mother (April Grace), his drug addict brother, his stoic-to-the-point-of-stone stepdad (Tom Sizemore), and his brief reunion with his estranged father (a steller, yet understated, performance by Chi McBride).
Subtle commentary on race … by not commenting on race. Our lead hero is black, his best friend Jake (Matt O’Leary) is white, and his girlfriend Cristina (Melonie Diaz) is Hispanic. The movie proceeds as if that’s the norm/not unusual and respects its audience enough to not feel the need to point it out. It gets its point across through performances, like the polite distrust of Cristina’s family when they first meet Mike.
“Why does it have to be you?” –Mom
No one wants him to go off to war. They want him to stay safe, with them. Mike’s mother knows all she can do is pray for her son. We have a natural sense of God as our protector and desire to seek His protection. We want His protection, especially in light of the fact that we can’t protect one another. When bad things happen, it’s like we long for God to step in, in a more direct way, and control things. We don’t ask such things when things are going “okay” (or as we’re making our own bad decisions). It’s like we want a “sovereign” God when it’s convenient.
We can live in a state of freedom in life, having a state of peace, faith, and confidence stemming from the assurance that we have in Christ Jesus. OR, we can continue on our own way, left to our own devices, with fear, doubt, and insecurity, trapped in a cycle of spiritual death. This assurance springs from faith in God as the ultimate protector, that sense that He is the ultimate, faithful judge.
“Whatever you’re doing, where do you think it’s going to take you?” –Mike
American Son makes for a mildly compelling, though wholly melodramatic, movie. While a personal movie looking at the life of a soldier about to be shipped off to Iraq, it has its share of dropped and unresolved storylines which didn’t make for the most satisfying of endings. Well-acted and without a political dimension, this movie is just a portrait of a man off to war: somebody’s son, somebody’s brother, somebody’s friend, somebody’s boyfriend. So maybe it can find its audience on DVD.





Congratulations! Our selection committee compiled an exclusive list of the Top 100 horror-novels Blogs, and yours was included! Check it out at http://thedailyreviewer.com/top/horror-novels
You can claim your Top 100 Blogs Award Badge at http://thedailyreviewer.com/blog/9347
Cheers!
Angelina…
But, um… Surely a war movie "without a political dimension" is superfluous, beside the point? WWII movies weren't apolitical or anodyne. They were filled with self-assured messages as to "why we fight". Most people at the time were pretty sure we should: that's the advantage, i suppose, to the movie industry of a "just war". H-wood knows it doesn't have that luxury this time around (or the last few times.) so what do they come up with – vague fuzzy bullsh*t? Hmm, this one sounds bit made-for-tv. So, i don't keep up with mpaa box office figures – you're saying that the ones with a(n anti-war) message in the past coupla years did badly? Bcos they were "preachy"?! C'mon, what about the whole anti-war movement and all the mike moore fans out there – they'd constitute a ready audience. Some of these fairly recent spielberg, constant-gardener-type movies (which latter i liked,i know,not a war movie) must have had decent box office. Not everyone wants to watch meaningless superhero movies. i heard rendition was
… not very good. Maybe it needed a *stronger* message? So what is your opinion on the war(s) anyway? should we be in countries that are nothing to do with us and no direct threat? Surely a movie which avoids the point all the time is no use. surely the audience would prefer *more* of a viewpoint, not less of one. Or maybe the movie needs some zombie soldiers to liven it up. better than filmmakers who treat the audience like zombies. Yeah – so how about the iraq movies that are more gung-ho? eg jarhead? is it the (republican) party line that these tend to sell better than the "michael moorish" preachers? What are the facts? Inquiring minds wish to know.
Yeah – sorry, i couldn't resist that image of a zombie suddenly turning up ! Wouldn't it liven up some of these turgid movies, though, for people to think they were one genre and they turned out to be another. Last thing i saw do that was the Tarantino-scripted From Dusk Till Dawn . So, you didn't like Valley of Elah? i heard it was based on a true story.
it isn't that i have or haven't liked any other war movies. it's just that none have really found an audience no matter how strong its message (or how balanced) its message. folks could simply be exhausted by the war simply through news coverage (as some theories attempting to explain the lack of box office have suggested).
with "american son" the war could be any war because the movie is more about preparing to go to war rather than about the war itself.
I get what you said about "American Son". i suppose that would make it a universal support the troops movie. but are your assertions about lack of box office draw really borne out by hard statistics? Source? And – what might this "war fatigue" really signify? in the 70s, people were sick of the Vietnam war, but not to my knowledge, sick of war coverage or movies about that war. Someof these, JohnPilger says, were misleading quasi-whitewashes like The Deer Hunter, whereas others were more challenging, like Apocalypse Now. so – do modern Americans feel they have to escape into alternative superhero worlds all the time? is this because of feelings of powerlessness? Mice, get to your feet, start roaring! The only alternative would seem to be faux war films, totally cod rewrites like Inglourious Basterds – my zombie war movie idea would have been better. After having seen all the reviews, this is one Tarantino movie i shall definitely give a miss. Box office figures = an indication of poor taste?
of the 20+ movies related to the war that have been released, you can probably check their numbers at boxofficemojo.com. a quick google search will probably turn up several articles on hollywood trying to figure out an explanation.
that said, lack of box office only points to an inability to find an audience. of all those movies, i could only think of in the valley of elah, rendition, redacted, and lions for lambs off the top of my head.
How about one of the earlier ones, Syriana with George Clooney? that did pretty well, $50m domestic as i can now see! (Hmm, that Boxofficemojo is a pretty neat site – wonder why i didn't notice any links to it from imdb before? anyway, thanks!) yeah, i liked syriana, and it got largely good reviews: maybe that's why it succeeded? i looked up some of the articles and studied the theories. the right wing tried to push their "we don' want that anti-american stuff" as usual. however, i lookedat a couple of recent movies which disproved this theory as statistics showed: (neither were big hits or flops.) one was "Stop-Loss", which was marketed to/predicted to do well among the younger set. it took about $10m domestic. The other was "The Hurt Locker" which was puffed up as a sure -fire Oscar winner and a hit (sans anti-war message.) That only took about a million more. they both may have made money though depending on production costs. They both used hand held and video footage.
Still, i think that people worldwide probably really are looking for "feelgood factor", if the success of "Slumdog Millionaire " is anything to go by! An enjoyable movie, some poignancy, irrelevant outcome. But – this is important – i don't see how you can have a socially relevant contemporary war movie without tackling the essential question: should we even be here?