There are no villains; we’re all heroes in our own story. It’s not like people wake up, roll out of bed and think to themselves “what kind of villainy can I get into?” Well, except for the star of Despicable Me. Its hero, anti-hero, protagonist Gru (voiced by Steve Carrell) has an accent somewhere this side of Russia. Not unlike anyone with a job, he wants to be the best at what he does: rise through the ranks, climb the corporate ladder, excel above his peers. So when new villain on the block, Vector (Jason Segel), comes along having stolen the Pyramid at Giza, Gru has to up the ante. He opts to steal the moon. But first he has to steal a shrink ray and his “lightbulb” of a plan involves adopting three little girls, Margo (Miranda Cosgrove), Edith (Dana Gaier) and Agnes (Elsie Fisher),
“In my eyes, you will always be one of the greats.” –Dr. Nefario
Told in flashbacks, we see the old wounds, lies and disapprovals that shape Gru into the villain he grew up to be. Beauty—in this case, an inner hero—sometimes has believed lies about itself, be it from a parent or a friend or a social group, to the point where it can’t recognize itself. The tragedy is that beauty is so often determined from the outside that we’re left in need of validation. We find ourselves consciously or unconsciously asking “Do you see beauty in me? Am I worth another glance?” We can become trapped in negative stories we’ve come to believe about ourselves and cling to a fundamental insecurity about ourselves to the point where we can recognize beauty in the mirror.
Still the son of a disapproving mom, still possessing desires and ambitions, and still human, Gru is not so far gone that he can’t be loved back to life by the presence of the three orphan girls and the relationship—the connection to his humanity—they represent. Love and acceptance frees him from his “Box of Shame”. We so often hear about God’s divine love and acceptance, how nothing can separate us from His love, but do we believe that? To think that God knows us in the deepest possible way, loves us unconditionally, celebrates who we are, and wants me to grow into who we are, that’s the kind of love we can hardly fathom. And He identifies with our humanity. Christ’s example on the cross left him exposed for everyone to see. Naked for people to mock, spit upon, and pour their own self-contempt on Him. Yet Jesus willingly embraced it and came through the other side. His wounded place exposes shame for what it is. Exposed, trusting and with boldness, we’re free and ready to love others in our weakness. To live out of that reality of His example.
“Tonight we’re going to read a new book.” –Gru
Finding and accepting this love, Gru begins to (literally) write a new story. One where the “big unicorn” realizes that he isn’t built to buy into the myth of the rugged individual, but rather was created for community and relationship. A story where he opts to create family adopting into his life the girls, his minions, his assistant Dr. Nefario (Russell Brand), and even his mom (a shrewdly cast Julie Andrews). And he lives the life of a changed and redeemed heart full of love.
Screenwriters Ken Daurio and Cinco Paul (working from an original idea by Sergio Pablos) use our familiarity with a number of animated features (from Shrek to Lemony Snicket’s A Series of Unfortunate Events to Monster’s Inc to Ratatouille) as capstones to build a new story. Despicable Me has some clever moments, in which the sheer amount of jokes thrown at the audience (with the subtlety of the 3D animation it employs) teetered on trumping the narrative for a while but eventually came together as a cohesive whole.





This sounds – like a delightful idea! What: another great animation with an original idea? I’m coming to lose track of all of these! Last one that came to my attention was the dragon one. (Did you see the finished version of that?) First off I’d like to quibble on one of your statements. You say: no-one gets out of bed in the morning thinking “what villainy am I going to do”. Well.. I’d say SOME do! Not everybody is either innocently well-meaning, OR thinks they are always in the right.. with the exception of neocons, nazis, and other fanatics. On a slightly different note, with the knowledge of archetypes vouchsafed me by my gods, I’d say Tricksters sometimes get out of bed bent on “villainy”! Usually of a humorous variety – except when not! Tricksters are very conscious beings, always wanting to cause a splash, sometimes being quite wrecker-like. They have to do this as it is their job to break boundaries. They know that people often view this as “bad”. Loki et al are like avant-garde artists: “they don’t
care.” Or:”YOU won’t pay me attention unless I do something BAD. Here I go: LOOK AT ME! Whee!” That’s how they think! I know. Naturally I support this hedonistic Trickster ideal! Whereas Gru seems to be more of the Calvinistic type of villain; he does things not out of whimsical pleasure and lulz, but because he thinks he is predestined to – always a mistake! (But obviously your kind of villain.) Not that I’m saying this is a bad analysis or idea for a movie; I’m sure I’d love it! It seems to me that Gru has a Christmas Carol-style change of heart, which is nice, because there isn’t enough about secular redemption in modern culture. Who is the big antagonist here though: who stands in front of Gru trying to prevent his evolution/”defection”? Are there any superheroes in it? Were he “caught”, wouldn’t that actually put the dampers on his progress? These are questions I would like answered.
Why does Gru’s mom disapprove of him? Is it because he is too bad or too good? Or not successful? I think this is a villain who chooses that path because of despair/negative self-image. Must be a lot of it about. Definitely not tricksterish. We’re far more enigmatic/elemental! Just for once I’d like a movie about an “irritating”, funny, mocking Trickster anti-hero who isn’t a pirate.
yes, the villain vector was the one standing in gru’s way. otherwise, i don’t want to give away too much of the movie for those who haven’t seen it.
yep, i saw the finished How to Train Your Dragon in 3-D at the imax. it was even more impressive. such a great movie.
That’s great. Wish I had an IMAX near me! It’s difficult to discuss a new movie without giving away the plot! Did it(Despicable) have any salty language in it? IMdB said it might have. Plenty of French charm too I bet. What did you think of my analysis of the 2 types of villain – hedonistic and Calvinistic? (Come on, you’re the latter sort of “antihero”, aren’t you?) How about a movie with a Trickster who isn’t Jack Sparrow or Marvel’s idea of Loki? Would you support it?
Maurice he’s busy. Must be. No time (not much) chit-chat, daily blog updates or driving more traffic/attracting more comments here. So what’s on your mind? Deadline?
What did you think of my idea about the 2 types of villains then? Agree/disagree? D’you deny that you are the emo, Calvinistic one? Whereas I, I am chaotic elemental! Come on we both know we’re troubled! (Incidentally, I thought that Marvel’s representation of Loki in the graphic novel of the same name was an example of the former; and therefore contradicted the meme of “original Loki”; but I liked it a lot nevertheless. It was way better than Neil Gaiman’s version or anything at all by Alan Snore. Marvel as ever showed themselves capable of the nuance which DC misses. Rodi has genuine pity on the suffering misfit Loki which I know the former company/individuals would eschew or make a mockery of. NB to writers: this girl always knows when you’re shamming. I wonder if some of the Rodi approach will make it into the movie: will we see “emo Loki” (as Marvel’s portrayal has never been “elemental Loki”; they do not see him as a fire god; s’okay; I “teach the controversy” on this issue!) Or will the movie simply
descend into the usual blockbuster cliches of the “gigantic enormity-filled evil supervillain” (which D.M. gently parodies I daresay).. BTW you know this “gigantic bad” thing, while very much over-used/done in contemporary movie-making, is nothing original, cutting-edge or even new-ISH?? I worked it all out for myself a few years ago. Know where it started, in movies? Bet you’ve never bothered to consider it. The overblown blockbuster villain stems from BOND VILLAINS OF THE 1960s! Which were introduced as camp tropes: the fact that post-60s movies take them seriously shows you exactly how silly their makers are! (And of course the “supervillain”, yes I have read Wiki’s article and I’m well ahead of them, stems from 1930s pulps and rmovie serial antagonists like Fu Manchu, which have racist undertones ergo you’re not supposed to like them!) Ah this is such a super huge subject! Hopefully we can discuss it all more fully some day.. I was just hoping that the upcoming Thor movie will not be too cliched and that
their Loki will be more of a “Marvel villain” if you know what I mean! More Magneto than mindless terrorist. (It’s SO easy to characterize your adversary as mindless, loony, completely motiveless, possessed by the Devil etc etc. One would have hoped the monotheists had grown out of such propaganda since Salem.) Anyway you really need to do a big spread about “Thor” as soon as it comes out! So I can write under it! And another post discussing villains and supervillains. Big subject like I told you. And a “which villain type are you” quiz. And.. when are you going to do all this? (Now he’s going to tell me he doesn’t want to promote the villain idea – though I’ve given him a brilliant one – “because noone is a villain in their own consciousness/sense of story/whatever postmodern thing.” Well – OK – what if Hitler thought that then? Eh? Anyway, I do know that some people know (when) they areantagonists -and glory in it! So it’s not true that everyone “wants”/intends to be “good” all the time!) Big topic as said.
i can qualify that statement if you prefer: “most people don’t roll out of bed thinking ‘what kind of villainy can i get into today?’” most times, then, people are the heroes in their own stories. they rarely think of themselves as the villain in a particular scenario.
yep. whenever i’m away from the blog, it’s probably due to me focusing on whatever writing project(s) i’m working on. actually, i try to plan ahead on the blog and space out posts so that you don’t really notice when i’m “gone”. during those times, i’m still around on twitter/facebook for the occasional check in.
i don’t recall any “salty” language in the movie. in truth, though, i rarely “hear” such things in media. it’s used so ubiquitously, it doesn’t really stand out to my ear.
Ah.. I think salty language in this case might have meant, more like PG than G. But what of the topic of Villains in Hollywood Movies in General? About most times/most people: yes I think you are right.. most people do like to think of themselves as heroes, protagonists – good point. But what about the few awkward people of whom a schoolteacher of mine said: there are always one or two! Like troublemakers – but they somehow find heroism in that, ie for them its heroic to be *antagonistic*. (Vector might be more like this in the movie.) Other people might not find them so heroic, hence the term villain. Some kids like that are in fact school bullies. Others, pure rebels. The teacher, ie Authority, is the least likely to approve of such a one! Be he bully or Percy Shelley; the antagonist I mean. Therefore, again, without regard to his core moral quality, if such a one persists successfully in contrary efforts s/he is sure to gain a certain glamour: that of Strength,. We’ve seen it in streets and schoolyards.
[...] Kitties, director Tim Hill brings us Hop. Animated by Illumination, the group that brought us Despicable Me, Hop is a buddy movie teaming up slacker Fred O’Hare (James Marsden) and dodging his [...]
[...] Two Kitties, director Tim Hill brings us Hop. Animated by Illumination, the group that brought us Despicable Me, Hop is a buddy movie teaming up slacker Fred O’Hare (James Marsden) and dodging his familial [...]