MoBro.
Wrath James White calls me this (only he and one of my uncles call me this). To this day, nicknames make me uneasy or at least uncomfortable. Granted, Wrath’s huge and thus gets away with a lot, but I’ve also begun to come to terms with the idea of nicknames. It doesn’t quite bother me like it used to because he’s like my big brother showing affection – I had gotten to the point where I couldn’t tell a well-intended nickname from a bad one.
Back in fifth grade, I was given the name “Crunch”. Now, I was the only black male in our class and as such, apparently I reminded a few of my mouth-breathing brethren of a Crunch bar. To this day, I doubt many of the folks I went to high school with even remember or knew the origins of the nickname since by then it had become strictly a term of endearment.
The “nicknaming” did not stop with Crunch, and became a source of amusement as the kids sought to outdo one another with their creativity at oral bullying. I was determined to not let their words hurt me, even making a joke of the issue. I carried around a list, filling up a page with three columns worth of “nicknames”: from Crunch(y) to Alabama Porch Monkey to Sambo (with some of the agile minds even putting the phrase “little black sambo” to a lilting melody)*. Granted, guys can be harsh with one another, riding each other, busting one another out of a sign of camaraderie and equality. But this was different and my little fifth/sixth grade brain trying to muddle through this acceptance through belittling, dehumanization, and the constant reminder of my “otherliness”.
It’s the analogous logic that leads some to take back the word “nigger” so that it loses its ability to hurt and we can make it our own … ignoring the reality that defending the use of that word only rationalizes the internalization of hatred. It perpetuates the legacy of hate, in one powerful word encompassing the history of slave ships to Jim Crow. The word is the penultimate form of dehumanizing, the spit-in-your-face kind of assault to one’s sense of dignity and self-worth.
The internalization of the hatred can eat away like a cancer. You learn to start absorbing hate, it becomes a standard way of dealing with accumulated hurts. Possibly even believing such hateful things actually define you. So this cycle of naming and internalizing continued until one day my teacher, Mrs. DuVall—also black—stumbled across the list.
“What’s this?”
“Nothing.”
“Looks like a list.”
“Just some things the kids call me.”
“Do you know what this is? What they’re saying about you?”
She then wadded up the list and threw it away. Just like that. People in power have the ability to name, to define, and I needed to take back any sense of power. The names don’t define me. My identity is not in hate, theirs or my own learned/absorbed (self-)hatred. We need to wad up the lists we’ve accumulated over the years—the ways our families, “friends”, or colleagues have contributed to developing our false selves—and throw them away. So I never tolerated any distortion of my name. I was always Maurice. Not Mo. Not Maury. Just Maurice.
Now since the first Mo*Con, I’ve been learning to re-embrace or rather better tolerate the nickname “Mo”. Because I know it now comes from a place of connection and familiarity.
I have no idea where this came from. It might be after effects from reading Wrath James White’s story, “Scab” (from the Dark Dreams III: Whispers in the Night anthology). I probably need to get back to writing my novel.
*When I called BFF Jon to help jog my memory on some of the other nicknames, his response was this: “Why are you needing to know fifth grade nicknames? The only one I can remember is Crunchy and I’m sure you already knew that one. There were plenty of others, none I would have taken the time to remember, because most of them were pretty stupid and racist by the morons we went to school with.” *Wadding up the list … again.*





I always think of you as "Little Brother". 'Cause I love you, and you're 'way younger than me. Or "Morris" when you forget if my name has the "h" or not.
Oh my goodness! When you first said "nicknames", I thought you meant cutesy family names! These aren't nicknames, they're horrible racist insults. Kids at your school were allowed to get away with screeds of this stuff, never challenged or put in their place by teachers? Doubt they would be today. But there are some names that kind of straddle the insult and harmless fun categories and are usually peculiar to one person; "Crunchy" may be an instance. There was a (white) boy at my school called "Crow" because of his big beaky nose. Other more "generic" insults.. well I hate to break this to you, but you surely don't think that black kids are the only ones to run the gauntlet of dehumanizing names? What do you think fat kids go/went through then (and perhaps even more so now?) I had three interchangeable NAMES (let's forget the "nick") at school: fatso, donut and beachball, not so creative. My mother didn't find "donut" so bad, because she pointed out it sounded rather sweet, like "sugar",
yeah, that was what i was getting at. in my head, nicknames–the idea of being named–denoted control and became equated with insult.
the internalized hate from it all was something that ended up being carried with me for a long time, probably the same way teased overweight kids have difficulty growing out of the identity of their body image.
This is a really good thread, which unfortunately seems difficult for me to post to! (I tried five times yesterday. I know when it's not you causing it because the posts don't go through as "saved". Just try again..)
Naming is control: basic principle of both magic and politics.
Yeah; and some overweight ex-kids never quite grow out of the, um, problem. Thing is, if one is fat, there is a "solution", a physical "way out", "way to change it". Though it comes at a cost – though not usually as drastic as MJ's bleaching himself white; but in severer cases of overweight, the treatment can be as "unnatural". Only it often isn't permanent. You can go slim; and particularly if female, there's all sorts of life stages and conditions that 'll put all the weight back on and more within a few years. Hey, it's nice to share! As to my abreaction compared to your abreaction (to schoolyard abuse) I won't say I reacted in the same way (eg, filled with bitter hatred well into adult life) but then, y'see, I had therapy – a kindly cleric gave me some free aged 19; later I built on that. Now d'ya see? But I'm still eccentric, a little wicked and worship Loki, the contrariest god I can find.. because… whatever doesn't kill you makes you stranger ! (!!!)
And I'm glad the teach threw that useless list away. (What did your parents think?) But I think she should have asked you which kids called you those names the most. Then there should have been a firm classroom talk or "homeroom discussion" addressed to all pupils, about "the kind of language/names we don't tolerate in this school". That would have been a good anti-bullying plan. So – and what would Mrs DuVall have done if some kid had called her "porch monkey"? Like to see that reaction. Was paddling still in use at that school? When was this – early mid-eighties? (BTW: this is what my old friend Lokes would have advised you: get one or two of these jokers, through flattery, to think that "porch monkey" was such a cool phrase that they really did try it out once in a vocabulary lesson with DuVall – watch the fireworks! He's a cruel god!)
Oh – wait a minute – I must just say: I am not American, though I do closely study your society. All the above-mentioned by Maurice insults have no emotional significance for me, as I and no one I knew would have ever used them or been called them. However, intellectually I know they are grave insults and some go back to the days of slavery ; but as to etymology, Maurice will know far more here than I. However I can imagine some naive kid thinking that the insult I quoted was something "cool", you know, like the rock group called Gorillaz? But they weren't around then yet! Kids just repeat words they hear. Still, it's a bit disquieting that a non-backwoods school in the 80s wouldn't have had a zero tolerance to racist bullying strategy: at least a cut that out strategy. Makes me see where all that anti-Obama teabaggery comes from.
(#1cont.)..and the "donut" handle was used by boys (so some unconscious flirting going on there, mother suggested – she read psychology magazines.) I still hated it: but some years later conceded her analysis was right. I think it's about the same with most "food" esp. "dessert" nicknames: they tend to be endearing rather than evil. (Not that I'm saying your same-sex classmates were coming on to you, oh no, Mo! Perish the thought. There is a world of difference between "donut" and "crunch".) And of course it differs on which gender is giving/receiving the name (eg I can imagine a boy nicknamed "donut" but it would have different connotations if given to him by a group of boys.) I'd say more and also introduce myself but there isn't space and Mo probably won't let me. But you know – I'll wind up by saying: calling NAMES can be a dangerous thing. Fiction, including comics provide cautionary tales. Like: "The Killing Peck", an Alan Grant story (a Batman one about The Penguin. Not funny at all; but humanist!)
So, Mo – did you ever come across that Alan Grant story? Circa 1990, "Secret Origins", I believe. It came out close enough in time to the events you mentioned for it to mean something to you as a – high-schooler? It was back in the days when some comics still had that "pulpy" feel: and were much better for it imho: instead of the overblown and hysterical soap operas (and all the more absurdist and less believable for it) that superhero comics are today. That's what I was complaing about in the "Batman we never knew ye" post thread or whatever the Gaiman book was called. Anyway: the Grant story's simple as good pulp should be. Building on the traditions of the old stories in a way far more straightforward than Alan Moore is capable of, it portrayed the child Oswald Cobblepot, physically disadvantaged from birth, being called cruel names by his classmates on account of his weight and looks, of which the most imaginative they manage to come up with is "penguin". Well…
i think i have that comic book around here somewhere.
Good! Grant's story portrays its young protagonist, the child Oswald, as a bright, studious chap, who (unlike in any similar effort by Alan Overrated) uses *reason* to try to overcome his problems. He leans toward the life sciences (so he has a touch in common with you, Mo: and me too; I liked a bit of biology in my day!) He deduces that he is being treated like "the runt" is in many animal societies; the last in the nest; so the only way in which to survive is to work to overcome his physical shortcomings; learn to fence with that umbrella and a lot more martial arts besides. By the time he is a teen he has largely succeeded in his goal. He beats the chief bully, Sharky, in a fair hand-to-hand fight (which would grant him respect for his warrior mettle from any pagan/heathen in the vicinity.) However, Sharky *has* no respect and on the last day of school decides to get a mean last blow at Oswald by killing all his avian pets; thus gaining the Penguin's(as most now more respectfully call him !)dire animosity
(Way to go eh – for the schoolyard thug – to make an enemy of one of the soon-to-be top gangsters of Gotham! Still: I can believe it of certain foresightless people.) The rest of the story is of course how Cobblepot plots and exacts his vengeance; here I must admit A.G. loses my suspension a little bit; for while I understand revenge is a dish best served cold, I can't see why Oswald would've waited that long. Still; the story is told in flashback, so we can't be sure of any time frame except it is long after Penguin has become established and known to the Batman.. a little long to leave revenge on the schoolyard bully? What say you? However, despite this and the story's overall gloom-and-doom tone (by then nothing new in comics).. it does benefit from some rather amazing artwork, by Sam Keith. He's pretty good, because his art isn't merely doomy, it's atmospheric. And it is done in a style slightly distorted in a novel way; and it contains several good – and human – face panels of the Penguin;
It's a good piece of comic book storytelling, I must emphasize. Probably the best in the issue. As you know (and I don't remember it being reissued in any other collection?) there were 3 other stories, 2 main and a "frame". The Riddler one, by Gaiman, was initially intriguing but proved to be rather thin. (Ie, the guy don't DO anything and we don't find out much about his past either, and this is supposed to be "enigmatic".) The one featuring Two-Face was initially my favourite in the "album", and I dismissed "Peck", but it grew on me; things sometimes do! (Sometimes!) The frame story, also by Gaiman, featuring a documentary team, supposed to tie the whole thing together – well, the less said about that, including some of the anti-free-speech-and-free-enquiry statements Gaiman makes the Batman utter, the better! I could write a better story about a documentary team in Gotham City; so could you. Alan Grant's/Sam Keith's contribution stands out as the best. The story title is somewhat daft; was it foisted on
Yeah. What I was GOING to say, strangely censored I remember, was: did the editor suggest such a silly title for a good piece of pulp like "killing peck"? Comics need a better class of editor. Another thing about comics with "killing" in the title: it's all hype, because rarely does anyone (major) getkilled in them: Sharky didn't in this. *So – how did you react to this story as a teenager?* With sympathy for Oswald, though he became an evuhl CC? How many bullied "nice guys" DO turn bad/to crime in adult life, I wonder? One thing about this story I do know is literally statistically true: a lot of ex-school bullies take up crime as a career! I think stories like this are a warning to society and I want to see more of them in comics. Which is why I asked you in general terms how you might handle a bullying-related story. I'd like a horror story on it that was like what the Chinese call.. I think a "ghost revenge story"; anyway where the karma of people's actions comes back to haunt them AND the
the whole of society: like the whole village! Yeah why did you cut my posts: I suppose I got a bit over-enthusiastic about the subject and you didn't want more repetition of the nicknames: you should have printed my joke though: it was cracking and at my own expense: I said "'the killing donut' – sure, kills you by cholesterol!" That musta raised a snicker! My point was simply that I envied Mr P. his evocative though spitefully-donated nickname! Something slightly original. The "food" handles won't cut it as noms de guerre, I meant! There is a reason for such people to treasure certain fitting names given to them, even in irony: I think it is because they contain magical power;artistically you might call them noms trouvés. And you have to realize – no modern DC author does – that as Mr P. gets older he grows into his role and he *likes* being "the bad Penguin" – it only gets easier! Another(kinda) encouraging message for we "survivors"! Also referring to my posts about Miéville's Remade!!
Now do you see that my "ramblings" do, after all, have some overall message? They do! I think Burgess Meredith had the Penguin just right, though! So, in a strange, opposite way did Mr Tem: did I tell you about Steve Rasnic Tem? Big short story writer and he writes for the horror market so you shoulda heard of him. "Vulture" – yes – try it some time!